Wednesday, 14 December 2016



Mindfulness Works but Only If You Work at It


Harvard Business Review

The latest trend in leadership development is mindfulness training. There is a burgeoning array of apps, self-help books, and corporate interventions designed to help leaders become more mindful and thus more resilient, focused, and aware — qualities that many executives believe can make them more effective in their roles.


Mindfulness — a way of paying attention with care and discernment to yourself, others, and the world around you — has been much researched. But although evidence from clinical contexts suggests that mindfulness provides many benefits, few studies have been conducted with business leaders. This means that basic questions have remained unanswered. For example, does mindfulness training actually improve leadership capacities? If it does, how? And how much effort do you need to make to achieve results?
Trying to answer these and other important questions, we conducted the world’s first study of a multi session mindful leader program, which included a wait-list control group. Half of the participants received their training immediately and the other half received it later, but we measured key characteristics in both groups at the same times. By comparing the two groups’ results, we were able to discover what the effect of training really was.
HBR data was drawn from 57 senior business leaders who attended three half-day workshops every two weeks as well as a full-day workshop and a final facilitated conference call. We taught them mindfulness practices, discussed the implications for leadership today, and assigned home practice of daily mindfulness meditation and other exercises. We recorded the difficulties in our participants’ attempts to learn to be mindful throughout the process.
We believe our findings provide a valuable, robust, and realistic guide for leaders seeking to become more mindful.
Harvard study shows that mindfulness training and sustained practice produces statistically significant improvements in three capacities that are important for successful leadership in the 21st century: resilience, the capacity for collaboration, and the ability to lead in complex conditions.
This is great news, isn’t it? An easy win. Go through a mindfulness program, and you become a better leader. But there is always a price to be paid. In this case it is formalmindfulness practice time.
We asked our leaders to undertake a variety of different formal mindfulness exercises, guided by audio downloads, every day. In addition, we encouraged them to do informal mindfulness practices (such as those laid out by Rasmus Hougaard and Jacqueline Carter in their article earlier this year). Our research shows that leaders who practiced the formal mindfulness exercises for more than 10 minutes per day fared much better on our key measures than those who didn’t practice much or who relied on the informal practices alone.
The message is clear: If you want the benefits, you have to put in the time to practice.
There is a paradox here, of course. Time is the one thing most senior leaders don’t have in abundance and are least willing to give up.
So let’s put the time commitment in perspective. We know that senior executives spend an average of 1,060 minutes awake per day. And yet allocating just 10 minutes — less than 1% of their waking hours — to practicing mindfulness proves demanding for some and impossible for others.
Our research points to some of the challenges that get in the way. First, leaders seek out mindfulness as a solution to their crushing work pressures, their busy timetables, their multiple task lists — and yet it is precisely these things that then get in the way of their practice. In our research, “busyness” and a focus on what needed to be done in the short term was one of the most commonly cited reasons for lack of practice. The leaders who made real changes determinedly broke through that self-defeating cycle of pressure.
But we also found that the leaders frequently berated themselves for their lack of practice. They felt guilty and even anxious. One memorable quote from an exasperated leader was, “I’m stressed about this mindfulness!” As they piled pressure on themselves, some began to dislike practice and a few finally resisted altogether.
Leaders can rarely develop a new habit, including practicing mindfulness, without help and support from others. Some leaders in our research received generous encouragement from their partners and work colleagues. In moments when they might have given up, this support sustained them. Others were met with cynicism and in a few cases were even teased.
Fortunately, the research helped us more clearly understand the things that can help leaders practice. It isn’t surprising that they are related to the challenges above.
Our research suggests that if you want to develop a formal mindfulness practice, you should:
  • Think carefully about when you are most likely and able to practice, and then fit 10 minutes into your routine so that over time it becomes a habit. First thing in the morning works best for many. Listening to an audio exercise on your commute is popular and seems to set up the day well. Others find that the only time they can commit to is just before bed. This can work, but it can often initiate sleep before the exercise ends!
  • Set realistic expectations for your practice; expect your experience with developing a new habit to be turbulent. Mindfulness is not about getting rid of all thoughts — it is about noticing what thoughts are there. Don’t be surprised if some days your mind is busy, fretful, or even wildly unruly. When this is the case, practice curiosity and the art of allowing.
  • Notice times when you begin to be more mindful and acknowledge the impact this brings to you and others. Seeing the benefits in your practice is essential to continuing.
  • If you feel comfortable doing so, tell those closest to you at work and home that you are trying to build a mindfulness practice. Tell them how they can help and support you.
  • Connect with others who are interested in becoming more mindful. You can encourage and challenge each other to keep to the practice.
Just like becoming fitter, becoming more mindful involves training. That means you have to practice. Giving up 1% of your time is a small price to pay for the improvements that are on offer.
For more updates, follow our Facebook page: www.facebook.com/directovoyage 
Happy Learning!

Saturday, 30 April 2016

The Science behind Reaction vs Response: Are you even using your brain?


The Science behind Reaction vs Response: Are you even using your brain?

One of the most repetitive and profound pieces of advice most of us have gotten right from childhood is to think before we say or do anything. And the simple reason cited for it is that we will save ourselves from making a mistake this way. How true is that? Does it carry any value? Can it be that when we are engaging in such reactive behaviour, we are not using our brains? New scientific research suggests to us that we are indeed not utilising our brains. 

One thing we all agree is that we have committed many mistakes in our lifetime. Even in simple situations, we may not have applied our brains. And we understand this and may have regrets too. However, when faced with a challenging situation yet again, our normal behaviour is once more of being reactive. Do you agree?

       Think about scenarios such as –

1.      Issues and fights you had with your boss or office colleagues
2.      Small issues with your spouse
3.      Sarcastic remarks from your friends
4.      Issues with your family
5.      Issues with a stranger

What is the first behaviour we display in any of the above situations? For most, it’s reactive in nature, and usually without thinking we may end up saying, or doing something which will create further issues.  Once we do this, and then may come either guilt, or a corrective action. But it may be too late, and the damage may have been done, or the relationship might end, or the pain may be inflected, or the opportunity may be lost. 

You will surely agree that apart from whatever situation may have caused the above issues, it got further aggravated or went out of proportion because someone reacted without even thinking properly. Reaction was the reason behind the behaviour, which was not acceptable. And it’s not only with individuals but also with large corporations, governments too.

If you remember the words of Viktor Frankl,  Austrian neurologist and psychiatrist as well as a Holocaust survivor, he put it very beautifully “Between stimulus and response, there is a space. In that space is our power to choose our response. In our response lies our growth and our freedom.” What Viktor Frankl was trying to say is that before we react, we must think, analyse, be aware and then choose our actions of responding and not of reacting.

So let’s see the science behind this and what happens in our brain when we choose to react and respond. Here I would like to cite two concrete areas of research, which have come in the field of neuroscience, giving us a very clear understanding of the topic. 

1.      Fight - Flight response

The most recent research tells us that in a single second, our brain processes more than 400 billion bits of information and we are only aware of around 2000 bits of them. These are mostly with respect to our body, time and environment. The Fight-Flight response is a mechanism of our brain which gets activated when we face a challenging situation. For example – if one is crossing a road in jungle and sees a tiger coming out, what will be one’s reaction? Either the person will try to fight it or simply run from there. During this event, our sympathetic nervous system gets activated. This helps the body to prepare for fight or flight by releasing adrenalin, increasing heart and breathing rates, increasing blood supply to muscles, and enhancing reflexes, amongst many more activities. All this happens even without our conscious awareness. Now this is a very useful process that our body has, but the real issue comes when after getting activated, it stays like this for days and weeks. This is now a cause for alarm. The human body is not meant to stay like this. It’s meant to be in peace and harmony which is the other process known as activation of Para-Sympathetic nervous system. This is when body heals itself.

Today so many of us perceive every situation as a fight or flight, resulting in our losing our calm even for small issues like someone cutting us off in traffic or a co-worker making a critical remark. We get angered by some words which we don’t want to hear, and in extreme cases, we are even ready to kill someone just on a small provocation. This is what happens when we are reacting. We are just in a rush to counter the other person and this happens because the brain is functioning differently.  This is when our emotional brain is active which is also known as the Limbic System. 


2.      Short and Long Route

Out of our three major brains, the Limbic Brain is known to be the emotional brain. One of the major structures of the Limbic Brain is a part called as Amygdala which is for decoding emotions and in particular, stimuli that are threatening to organisms. Many of our brain alarm circuits are grouped together in Amygdala.  
 
The Amygdala is involved in several functions of the body including:

1.      Arousal
2.      Autonomic Responses Associated with Fear
3.      Emotional Responses
4.      Hormonal Secretions
5.      Memory

Now let’s look at an example of when somebody plays pranks on us. What happens? We instantly react and later discover that it was a prank. We end up feeling like fool. But why does this happen?

The Amygdala is able to process sensory information and initiate behaviour responses before the information reaches the brain which is involved in awareness and thinking, namely the Prefrontal Cortex. The Neocortex is the most advanced brain we have which is on the front top of your head. Prefrontal cortex is a part of the Neocortex.   




The Amygdala, which controls our behaviour, gets sensory information from two sources, namely the short and long route.  Like all sensory information, the message first comes to the Thalamus. The Thalamus is involved in sensory functions and regulation of motor functions.

In the short route, the information from the Thalamus is directly sent to the Amygdala by-passing the Cortex. This produces a fast reaction to the situation, but it may not be the correct one.

In the long route, the information travels from the Thalamus through the Cortex (visual, auditory, prefrontal cortex) and then to the Amygdala. The Cortexes are responsible for evaluating a situation, assigning a meaning to it. If the meaning is threatening, then the Amygdala is informed to make an appropriate response. This long route is what gives us the ability to understand and respond, instead of reacting. If you notice the above, we give meaning to the situation and based on that meaning, the reaction or response comes. Giving meaning is under our control in the first place even before the Amygdala gets into action.

The freedom Viktor Frankl refers to in his quote, is following the long route which uses the brain responsibly for thinking and choosing.            

The Amygdala also gets input from the medial prefrontal cortex, which is involved in the planning phase of the response, after the initial reactions has been done and one has to choose the best way out of the danger. The Amygdala is fully developed at the time of birth but the prefrontal cortex gets fully developed only till early adulthood. Because of this, children and adolescents do not always make rational choices. This is true in many adults too. 


So now we understand that whenever we are reacting instantly to any situation, we are not using our thinking brain, the brain which is responsible for us to make choices with awareness. If you observe closely, you will find that so many of us live this way and end up creating chaos, fight, violence and pain. Whereas, if we choose to take time to respond, so many of our issues will be resolved, and may in fact not even arise.


Given below are a few suggestions we can use to make sure that we are always in control and responding with awareness –

1.     Practice meditation even if it’s as simple as reflecting back on the day’s events or past events from    a non-judgmental attitude. 
2. Meditation can also be of mindfulness, which is just being in the moment and being fully aware of our thoughts, emotions, and what is happening in our body. 
3. Always count 15-to-1, when you find yourself in a situation where you are going to react.
4.Ask yourself before you have an urge to react, “Is this the best response I can give?”
5. Drink a glass of water, before you react in anger or are in a tense situation.
6.The moment you find yourself feeling some negative emotions, simple become aware of your breath, and exhale the negative emotions out.
7. Practice the affirmation, “I am in full control of my response and I accept myself fully”.
8.Tap 5-8 times the place in the body where you feel the negative emotions and affirm, “I release and drop as I only carry happiness”.
9.Before you react, tell yourself, “I am not using my brain, I am being foolish”. 
10.Ask in these situations before you react, “What’s really important?”

Gautama Buddha said, “To conquer oneself is a greater task than conquering others”. This is so true. We are always out to change everyone around, finding fault in and blaming others, without even realising that the change should start with us. We should be the example of the change that we are looking for in others. 

How are you planning to respond to life situations instead of reacting? Do leave your comments below, with any unique strategies you have for challenging situations.


 References:

[1] http://thebrain.mcgill.ca/flash/i/i_04/i_04_cr/i_04_cr_peu/i_04_cr_peu.html
[2] http://knowingneurons.com/2013/02/27/the-amygdala-a-full-brain-integrator-in-the-face-of-fear/
[3] http://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/educational-resources/neuroscience-and-psychiatry/neuroscience-and-psychiatry-module-2-fear-safety-anxiety-and-anxiety-disorders.shtml
[4] http://biology.about.com/od/anatomy/p/Amygdala.htm




Warm Regards

Avinash Anand Singh

Chief Mentor & Advisor ( DV )

09890474536

http://www.directovoyage.com/advisory.php




Sunday, 24 April 2016

Time Management and Misconceptions



 Time Management and Misconceptions
Most managers do not understand the concept of time management in the proper sense, though most of them claim to be practicing it. There are certain myths or misconceptions about time management. A few of those are :
1. The harder one works, the more he gets something done :One of the myth of activity. It has generally been found that managers spend or waste most of their time on routine and trivial matters. This leaves them too busy to attend to their own job. They could easily have delegated the less important jobs to subordinates.especially this is found in few Heavy manufacturing and Automobile companies
2. Higher level management makes better decision :- No, its not always true. Lower level people can also take good decisions. On the other hand all the decisions taken by the top level are not always fruitful.
3. Delay in decision making improves its quality:  Further delay seldom improves the quality of decision. If all the information has been gathered and analysed, it is better to go ahead with the decision making.
4. Time can be saved :- No, time cannot be saved. Time can be utilised in an efficient way by getting more out of the available time
5. Reducing the time on activities means better time management:- This is also a myth. Time should be allotted to various activities but priority wise.
6. It is best to do everything yourself :- Doing all the work yourself does not mean better time management. In this way you will end up doing all the less important work and leaving the important tasks unattended.
7. Most of the day's activities do not need planning:- Planning the day's activities in advance gives a clear picture of what must  be done. Good planners make a provision for unforeseen interruptions.

Next ...coming up... Time Wasters...


Warm Regards,
Ranjana Tripathi
Chief Mentor & Advisor (DV)
+918378973012
http://www.directovoyage.com/advisory.php
Facebook Id: https://goo.gl/fpHEEm

Friday, 15 April 2016

Workshop on Facilitation Skills

Workshop on Facilitation Skills: Do you Apsire to Inspire your audienceTo convey your message in an effective and impactful mannerAn insight on how to target different set of audienceUnderstand and implement Adult learning patternCom

Thursday, 14 April 2016



The 5 Criteria of Process Transformation


When looking at business over the past 10, 20 or 40 years, it’s clear that all of the major functions have been transformed by various different technologies methodologies or systems. All of these transformations have five basic criteria in common. Additionally, there are further examples where a new innovation or system has promised much but has ultimately failed to achieve the full transformational potential that was initially suggested.
Before outlining the five basic criteria for process transformation in depth, the following is a high level introduction to some of the technologies that have changed the landscape of business.

• Communications       • Email • The Internet
• Finance                      • Derivatives an   • Securitisation
• Logistics                    • Containerisation • RFID (radio frequency identification)
• Marketing                  • CRM • Social Media
• Manufacturing           • Six Sigma • ERP (Enterprise resource planning  )
• Sales                          • Mobile phones • Smart phones and tablets


The list above is quite diverse with some items dating back 40 or 50 years such as containerization and the internet while others have only emerged in the past 3, 4 or 5 years such as social media, smart phones and tablets. The point however is not historic but is more a reflection on the absence of anything related to HR or people management. Additionally, the six functions above are all core to contemporary businesses.
Logistics and manufacturing are sector specific while changes to internal and external communications, marketing and sales all impact the service sector. Given this broad based change, it would be hard to find a contemporary organisation that has not benefited from or does not use one or more of the transformational innovations above.
The following five criteria create a framework with which to judge the likely success of transformational change in any particular function or department.
                
  1. Simple to Explain
2. Consistent, Scalable and Predictable
3.  New Skills     
4. A Business Case      
5. External Validation

1. Simple to Explain
The first criterion is that the change or innovation must be explained simply and clearly. This explanation can take many different forms but the majority of people affected or who could benefit from the change should be able to understand it. The explanation may take the form of a simple memo, a diagram, a short presentation or the classic elevator pitch. The point is not the medium itself but that the transformation be communicated quickly and easily.
2. .Consistent, Scalable and Predictable
The second criterion is arguably the most important. The ability for the innovation or process to be run in a consistent, scalable and predictable fashion is vital for its success. Being able to reuse a particular methodology or system in a consistent manner goes a long way to creating a robust business case for deploying the innovation in question.
            3. New Skills
The development and acquisition of new skills is the third criteria for successful transformation. New skills demonstrate that the underlying innovation is fundamentally different and that a new approach is required to realise its benefits. By extension, the development of new skills is an important test in the adoption of any new transformational process or system.
4. A Business Case
The ability of any innovation or process to show business value is paramount. As mentioned already, context is very important and what is valuable in one instance may not be valuable in another, so every situation needs to be looked on it’s own merits.
           5. External Validation
         The fifth and final criteria for process transformation are external      validation.     External validation is a way of showing credibility and endorsement amongst peers and relevant stakeholders for the change in question.

Warm Regards,
C S Manjunath
Chief Mentor & Advisor (DV)
+919483086615
http://www.directovoyage.com/advisory.php
Facebook Id: https://goo.gl/tjA4T9